Jesse Forster

When it comes to the industry’s opinion on “new innovative trading venues”, the latest Coalition Greenwich report found that an overwhelming 91% of both US low-touch brokers and their buy-side clients have between “a little” and “a lot” of interest in the venues. 

This huge number is understandable given the significant amount of all US equity volume being executed on ATSs. With institutional trading contributing around 33% of overall equity market volumes, the conclusion is that half of all liquidity needs are currently being fulfilled on ATSs.

Speaking to the rise of ATSs – thanks in large part to their established focus on execution quality above all else – one electronic trading head based in the US told Coalition Greenwich: “They solved for performance, now they just need to solve for liquidity”.

Read more: Data arms race heats up as venues and vendors eye buy-side business through new initiatives 

Delving deeper into the data, 38% and 53% of US low-touch brokers showed “a lot” and “a little” interest respectively, compared to 28% and 63% respectively on the buy-side client side.

Speaking to the motivators, one surveyed sell-side head asserted: “The buy side wants to see us trading there. They expect us to be experimenting with them with different types of orders under different conditions in different times of the day.”

This is arguably a straightforward supply and demand situation. With market sentiment shifting, many across the market are crediting the new generation of traders with driving change thanks to their new age thinking and openness to new ideas and innovations.

Trading venues are continually having to adapt as liquidity gets more and more fragmented – a key challenge when it comes to ATSs. However, it is apparent that key market participants on both the buy- and sell-side are highly cognisant of the importance of not falling behind the curve of change. 

As the landscape develops at an ever-faster pace, it is only logical that so too will the means by which trading is executed.

Jesse Forster, head of equity market structure and technology at Coalition Greenwich, explained: “ATSs are incubators in a market structure laboratory, with less stringent rule sets than exchanges. The ATSs gaining traction today have sparked a hunger for further innovation, paving the way for the next generation of groundbreaking trading venues to emerge.”

Coalition Greenwich’s ‘the innovators: how and why alternative trading systems succeed’ study was based on feedback from Q3 2024 wherein interviews were conducted with equity market professionals in the US working at ATSs, exchanges, asset managers, broker-dealers, fintech providers, and industry associations.

The post US market increasingly ready to embrace alternative trading systems appeared first on The TRADE.

He joins the firm from Deutsche Bank where he served as a currency options trader.

Prior to this, Roberts spent five and a half years at NatWest Markets, most recently serving as a FX derivatives trader.

Elsewhere in his tenure at NatWest Markets, he worked as a US rates strategies.

Roberts announced his appointment in a social media post.

This latest appointment follows that of Olivia Gassner, who was appointed VP, equity electronic sales trader at JP Morgan earlier this month.

Gassner joined the firm from RBC Capital Markets, where she served in the same role for three years prior to the move. 

The post JP Morgan taps Deutsche Bank for new FX options trader appeared first on The TRADE.

It is an interesting question because there is a broad spectrum of approaches across organisations. It fluctuates between those organisations that are leaning in and are on the front foot and those that are watching carefully and are engaged but they have not yet put all of their chips on the table. There are also organisations that are unsure of how to start and how to enable themselves and I think there’s a humility that comes with that. 

There is an interesting dynamic within AI where it is accessible to all of us, but challenging to implement within financial services. As much as there are some really exciting things that we can do with AI, in financial services we have a lot of regulation and compliance that we need to think about.

Culture within firms is also a significant factor. AI is not one team’s problem to solve, you have to get a community really working together for a truly holistic approach. 

We are starting to see a change in terms of the demands of the end users and in their actual way of working, which is impacting the character of these previously very tightly defined personas. I think that is going to have a really interesting effect in financial services.

How feasible is AI use when it comes to trading?

One of my rules with AI is that if you have to explain it and you have to repeat it, maybe don’t use it. The problem with AI is that it is a probabilistic model so if you ask the same question twice, you’re potentially going to get a different response.

That of course doesn’t mean it’s not valuable, but it means that you have to think very carefully about which use case you are solving for. So, when it comes to traders, this is really fascinating because it comes down to trust – if a trader was like a magic box and every time you shook it came out with a different answer, would you trust it?

Traders are essentially accountable, so the idea that people are going to use AI and potentially get different outcomes that they can’t fully explain in these high-risk tasks seems implausible.

Furthermore, the idea that regulators are ever going to get comfortable with AI giving the best answer only “most of the time” is highly unlikely. For that reason, I think traders are going to be around for a while.

What is meant in practice when the industry says we must adopt AI in a responsible way?

When it comes to responsible AI, the key is trust. One has to delve into what it actually means to be responsible – essentially, if you’re using AI enabled processes, can you trust it and what does it mean to trust something?

One aspect is knowing where the data has come from, another is checking for biases and establishing the ethics of models, and another is choosing the right model for the right task and taking responsibility for that selection.

At the end of the day, we are now responsible for products that are AI enabled, so a big part of that responsibility is reinforcing it, through a secondary model and maybe a tertiary model. In the event that something catastrophic happens, we must have that ability to say, ‘not a problem, we have a back-up, we’re going to switch to something else that is more suitable and continue to uphold the status quo’.

How important is that holistic approach to AI?

What’s important to note – aside from teams coming together to approach this at the same time – is the fact that AI came from outside of financial services and is now being imported into financial services. We are seeing examples in other regulated industries of how people are implementing AI which has the potential to be hugely transportable and relevant when we think about financial services.

I believe that this is going to have a dramatic effect on the way that financial services operate because in the past we’ve seen financial services very much segregated from everything else and tightly defined. That is now starting to change, and we are starting to see cross industry collaboration. 

Interestingly, we are not only focused on the research and investment in AI within financial services. As a community, we are beginning to see the potential relevance of AI investment within other industries. A part of this is greater mobility of  talent from non-finance industries, bringing relevant new perspectives and skills.

The post Fireside Friday with… LSEG’s Emily Prince appeared first on The TRADE.

Kicking off this whistle-stop summary as the number one most impactful innovation in the industry is the order and/or execution management system (OEMS) – the beating heart of trading desks around the world. Brought to market in the early 2000s, the sometimes combined and sometimes separated systems were designed to enhance the previously manual processes associated with managing and executing orders. They offer a nifty alternative to the previous plethora of both written records and later, excel spreadsheets that traders were previously forced to grapple with each day to keep things in order.

These systems touch upon all elements of the trading lifecycle throughout the front-to-middle-to-back-office including execution, order, risk and portfolio management. Traders’ order blotters sit within these systems and trading teams use these systems to consolidate data sources and research in one place to increase efficiency and speed when going about day-to-day activities. They also use them to access the market, connecting directly to counterparties to access liquidity. An EMS overlays an OMS by enhancing connectivity, aggregating data and being more flexible as it solely pertains to execution needs.

The systems are constantly evolving to meet the needs of the industry with new third-party vendors integrating their offerings via API in order to gain access to clients using them. While adoption is widespread in equities other asset classes such as fixed income have been slower to adopt these systems given the nuances of the workflows and liquidity landscapes in these markets. For more information on the various providers in the EMS market, check out The TRADE’s annual survey.

2. Bloomberg Terminal

Up next and needing little introduction is the Bloomberg Terminal, Bloomberg’s data and proprietary trading platform. First brought to market in the early 80s the system has over the decades earned its title as the leading market data source and a must have for any financial institution looking to execute in the markets. This is reflected in its annual subscription now nearing $30,000. For this reason, the system is favoured by institutional investors as opposed to individual ones.

Its black background and computerised white text might seem a little out of date to individuals outside of the industry but its role in the financial markets has cemented this interface as a poster child for financial services. Home to Bloomberg’s central data services the interface offers users access to news, data, analytics, and multi-asset trading tools. Given its widespread adoption by institutions it’s also a people move source as users can see up to date contact details of peers. According to Bloomberg, it offers  sell-side and independent research from over 1,500 sources as well as proprietary research on various industries and markets.

3. CLS

Coming in at number three is the multi-currency settlement system, CLS. While perhaps not one of the most exciting aspects of the trade lifecycle, settlement is a central process that acts as a pillar for the capital markets. The settlement period relates to the space of time between the trade date and the settlement date when a trade is considered complete. Within this window both the buyer and seller must undertake any necessary actions to ensure the transaction can be completed.

Established in 2002, the CLS network is designed to minimise risk and offer operational efficiency to institutions within the settlement window by avoiding bilateral settlement that is more likely to fail.

The settlement window has found itself in the industry spotlight as of late thanks to the recent decision from regulators in the US to move North American markets to a T+1 settlement period, down from T+2.

4. Central limit order book (CLOB)

While it is easy to romanticise the sheer graft that went into trading a few decades ago, the introduction of central limit order books (CLOBs) and streamed pricing were much-needed innovations. The idea that in order to understand the changing price of an individual stock or security, one would have to study daily directories and newspapers is something that many of those starting out in the industry today will never understand. With no central directory of orders in the market, understanding pricing must have been a headache to say the least, leaving many individuals subject to arduous process of calling everyone in the phone book.

CLOBs allow for transparency of live orders that are prioritised by price and time. By seeing what is available on the order book, traders have an idea of how much volume can be executed at a specific price. Facilitated by exchanges, a CLOB allows buyers and sellers to submit their trading interests and then utilises a matching engine to match buy and sell orders based on specific requirements such as price time priority. Once a trade has been matched the buy and sell orders are removed from the order book and the bid and ask prices are updated accordingly to reflect the change.

CLOBs offer greater transparency and consolidated liquidity meaning participants have a greater chance of trading. They’re typically used in equities given that this asset class trades on exchange unlike fixed income and some foreign exchange assets. Thanks to huge leaps in technology, participants can hide their full amounts in what’s known as “iceberg orders” that replenish the order book once liquidity has been matched and removed from the book.

5. Algorithmic trading

Rounding out the top five of The TRADE’s rankings of the most influential innovations to come to trading are algorithms and the concept of executing algorithmically or automatically. Most common for low touch and ‘easy flow’ algorithms are often used for small orders in highly liquid markets. Algorithms are a computer programmed trading workflow that follows a defined set of parameters. These parameters could be anything from liquidity seeking to volume dependant or venue-specific such as dark seeking.

Algorithms often offer traders a quick and easy route to market. They remove the opportunity for human error by taking away any manual processes and offer a low latency solution that will often achieve best execution and avoid any unwanted price changes.

While this all sounds fantastic and you may be wondering why they aren’t used for all flow, there are some downsides. Unpredictable activity in the markets such as Black Swan events can render algorithms that rely on historical data useless and result in losses for firms. At the other end of the spectrum, a lack of human judgement and intervention can sometimes result in lesser results in nuanced situations that require human intuition.

Buy-side institutions will often use a broker’s algorithmic suite for execution, with many sell-side institutions vying for the interest of clients with the launch of new and innovative products with flashy names. Less common is the development of proprietary algorithms inhouse on the buy-side given the cost, time to implement, and the speed at which priorities evolve. For more information on algorithmic trading providers, check out The TRADE’s annual survey.

6. The FIX Protocol

Think of the FIX Protocol – or the Financial Information Exchange Protocol – as a universal language allowing institutions to communicate clearly when looking to execute in the market. Used by the buy- and sell-side as well as venues and regulators the FIX Protocol is an industry standard used to complete transactions. It was originally cooked up in the early 90s by Robert Lamoureux and Chris Morstatt in order to exchange equity information between their respective firms Fidelity Investments and Salomon Brothers.

The crux of the protocol isa language comprised of a series of messaging specifications to be used in trade communications. Each specification whether it be size or time or client type has a number or letter associated with it making trading intentions clearer and more clean-cut no matter where they have come from. The protocol was designed in an attempt to simplify workflows and reduce error by creating an industry standard to adopted by all.

The standard is non-proprietary and free. It is owned by the FIX Trading Community made up of buy and sell-side firms, vendors, industry associations and trading venues. While originally only focused on equity information, the FIX protocol began supporting straight through processing (STP) in the 90s and also later added indication of interest (IOI) capabilities to its roster.

7. Dark pools

Dark pools are trading venues where institutional investors can access liquidity without giving away any pre-trade information. Dating back to the 80s these private pools emerged in the US as a way of institutional investors executing without showing their hand to the market in a bid to limit market impact, later arriving in Europe. Given the proliferation of high frequency trading (HFT) several investment banks chose to launch these alternative trading systems (ATS) as a means of protecting institutional clients who are typically slower to execute.

They were originally designed to facilitate block trading but have since evolved to support trades of all sizes – something that has led to criticism from some corners of the market in recent years. Some regulators – in particular those in Europe – have begun exploring how to limit dark trading in recent years given its potential role in reducing volumes on the price forming lit order books hosted by exchanges.

Dark trading is a popular practice globally. While there are specific dark pool operators such as Liquidnet and Virtu, many of the incumbent exchanges also have dark pool offerings.

8. All-to-all trading

Next up is all-to-all trading – which does what it says on the tin. The protocol is a type of trading that allows buy-side institutions to provide liquidity and trade amongst each other. Historically trading has always involved a sell-side counterparty that will access the market and source liquidity on behalf of a buy-side client. The introduction of all-to-all trading has subverted this workflow and is an attempt from venues operating these liquidity pools to offer buy-side firms an alternative means of trading.

The protocol is heavily focused on the fixed income markets and has seen recent growth in the foreign exchange sphere. It has seen a boom in recent years as institutions have looked to diversify the way that they executed. Chief among the catalysts for its growth was the Covid-19 pandemic which began in 2020 and subsequently saw many traditional sell-side institutions reduce their balance sheet and withdraw from the market.

Tradeweb launched its all-to-all corporate bond trading functionality in 2017. Rival fixed income trading venue Bloomberg launched its global all-to-all bond trading service in 2022. However, first off the bat was MarketAxess which launched its Open Trading all-to-all trading environment in 2012.

9. Transaction cost analysis (TCA)

Transaction cost analysis (TCA) is perhaps one of the most heavily discussed industry topics as of late thanks to the plethora of data now needed to execute and to prove best execution to clients. The process is used by institutional investors to analyse data to evaluate their trade performance post-trade, ensuring they have achieved the most competitive pricing. The data is used to make decisions on which sell-side counterparties to keep on an algo wheel or ‘panel’.

While the process has historically been a post-trade one, in today’s trading environment many desks are now assessing how to feed this information into their processes pre-trade in order to ensure further efficiencies.

Today, buy-side trading desks are increasingly using new technology to evolve their TCA use towards something more proactive, utilising predictive analytics that enable participants to anticipate and mitigate execution risks, optimise trading strategies, and help to generate alpha. The data is increasingly being used as more than a simple measurement, but instead is being applied to make better informed trading decisions.

TCA can be done in-house but is also offered by third party providers.

10. Systematic internalisers (SIs)

Next up in The TRADE’s innovation rundown are systematic internalisers (SIs). Usually hosted by bulge bracket banks, SIs are an internalising mechanism that allow banks to execute flow over the counter or off exchange. They’re an alternative venue to the lit order books hosted by exchanges. Within SIs, banks can cross flow from their various business divisions using their central risk books without going out to the market to find the other side. Within these ecosystems they can cross client flow with each other or cross it with their own proprietary workflows.

As an alternative trading venue to the lit order books these venues have found themselves under scrutiny as of late from some that argue that SI volumes are harmful to wider market structure as they do not contribute to price formation and fragment liquidity. Flip the coin and many participants argue that if a trade achieves best execution, it doesn’t really matter where it was executed so long as it achieved the optimal outcome.

In Europe, the SI regulatory regime was introduced in 2007 as part of the Mifid I regulation. The quasi-dark venues properly took off in 2018 with the introduction of Mifid II and greater restrictions on dark trading.

11. Direct market access (DMA)

Many of the innovations in this lengthy list offer a new way for buyers and sellers to access the markets and direct market access (DMA) is no different. In years gone by, buy-side firms have placed orders via a sell-side broker to be traded on exchange. However, DMA is the process of directly connecting electronically to an exchange in order to trade on exchange securities without using a broker or intermediary.

These pipes require advanced technological capabilities and are usually developed by sell-side firms. Buy-side firms will often pay to integrate said pipes in order to gain direct access to the exchange without having to go through the sell-side counterparty. The process offers a disintermediation of the typical broker trading workflow and creates greater optionality for investors looking to access the markets.

12. Hight Frequency Trading (HFT)

High frequency trading (HFT) firms have extraordinary computing capabilities. Sometimes known as proprietary trading desks, these firms are famous for their high-speed connections to the markets that leverage co-locations at exchanges and enhanced proprietary data feeds to gather information. They capitalise on the information gathered in one location to trade ahead of slower institutional investors on other venues.

The process was first brought to the world’s attention in Michael Lewis’ 2014 novel ‘Flash Boys’ which unpacks the role of latency in trading in light of the shift to electronification. The crux of the story: electronification and the laying of fibre optic cables to access venues had opened the door for these faster and more predatory firms, able to nip in ahead of institutional investors.

Today, HFT firms will often use microwaves using satellite dishes at exchanges to gain greater speed still. Some venues, such as Aquis, banned HFT on their venues as part of their USP. Aquis, however, moved to lift this ban last year in order to expand its liquidity pool in a decision that had both supporters and critics.

13. Exchange traded funds (ETFs)

Exchange traded funds (ETFs) have seen a journey to dominance in the last ten years in the advent of more passive trading strategies as opposed to more active ones. ETFs offer investors a chance to buy and sell a basket of securities as if it were a single stock and transaction.

ETFs track and mirror how a pool of exchange traded securities is trading on exchange and price themselves accordingly. They can simply track an index or they can be made up of a custom basket of stocks. The first ETF to launch in the US was the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) in 1993. ETFs, among other index tracking investment vehicles, have become popular in the increasingly passive trading era where low risk index-based strategies offer greater returns for investors in exchange for half the fees charged by active investors. Given their low risk and low fee model they’re extremely popular with retail investors.

While these trading products are usually passive, active ETFs with an active manager picking and choosing what goes into them, have also seen a surge in popularity in recent years.

14. Periodic auctions

Coming in at number 14 are periodic auctions, an innovation which offer an alternative location for investors to trade instead of the lit order book. Like SIs, periodic auctions saw a boost in interest following the implementation of Mifid II regulation in 2018 and the restrictions it imposed on dark trading venues.

The core difference between a periodic auction and a CLOB is that periodic auctions are not continuous. Various models exist but at their core, periodic auctions collect buy and sell offers to determine a price and then triggers a call period whereby participants can see the indicative price and how many shares can be expected to be executed. Participants then have the option to submit firm orders into the auction. These built in inherent speed bumps favour slower investors and prevent them from being picked off as they might be in the lit books.

The venues have become increasingly popular in recent years because they help investors seek price improvement by prioritising order size over speed at the order allocation phase. They are price-forming rather than price-referencing and they introduce randomness in trade timing. Several alternative trading systems (ATS) being brought to market recently have built their offerings around the skeletal structure of a periodic auction.

15. The Cboe Volatility Index (VIX)

The Cboe Volatility Index (VIX), has become an increasingly essential tool for traders as of late and, given the current market dynamics it’s likely it’ll remain front and centre in traders’ minds for a while yet. Created by Cboe Global Markets in 1993, the original index was used to measure the market’s expectation of 30-day volatility suggested by at-the-money S&P 100 Index (OEX Index) option prices.

In 2003, the index was updated as part of a partnership with Goldman Sachs. Designed to reflect a new method of measuring volatility the index is now based on the S&P 500 Index (SPX) for US equities. It estimates volatility by consolidating the weighted prices of puts and calls on the SPX. It has become a priceless tool for participants looking to track market volatility and for those trying to understand investor sentiment in times of market stress.

The need for such tools has been exacerbated in the last few years thanks to several major unprecedented market events, not least the global pandemic and the new ‘black Monday’ seen on 9 March 2020.

16. Portfolio trading

Next up is portfolio trading. The concept is heavily linked to ETFs and is not dissimilar from program trading in that it allows for the trading of a basket of stocks. Portfolio trades allow traders to execute a basket of stocks in one single transaction, minimising costs and allowing traders to bundle less liquid or more difficult to trade instruments in with more liquid transactions. The concept has exploded in the last few years, egged on by market conditions and volatility brought on by the pandemic and other macroeconomic factors.

Electronically, it is a relatively new phenomenon to the last four to five years, and the protocol has gained momentum alongside other forms of electronic trading that differ from request for quote (RFQ) protocols on multi-dealer platforms, as participants look to minimise their market impact and avoid information leakage. Manually, however, the practice has existed for many decades using a laborious process involving excel spreadsheets and phone calls. Portfolio trades have historically helped many institutions to move big blocks of risk.

The protocol appeals to the sell-side for several reasons, namely the fact that they can take a basket of securities and use them in other trades, special purpose vehicles (SPV) or, importantly, the exchange traded fund (ETF) create and redeem process.

17. Axe trading

The next innovation on The TRADE’s list is axe trading, which is based on… you guessed it, axes. Coined from the phrase ‘an axe to grind’ an axe shows a trader’s interest in buying or selling a specific security. Shown as a grid these tools are used by participants to indicate to their counterparties what they want and need to get done in a certain security so that they might go off and set about getting it done for them in the markets.

Outside of a chosen list of counterparties, traders will usually keep axes private as they indicate potential future moves and this information could be used by someone looking to front-run them in the markets. The process was one typically associated with just bonds but it has since expanded into different securities. Several vendors and platform providers have sought to launch new and innovative solutions that integrate dealer axe data into workflows in a bid to streamline the trading process. The concept has given birth to new platforms and vendors in the market with axe-led quoting and execution management systems (QEMS) at their core.

18. Conditional orders

Conditional orders do what they say on the tin. Many different order types exist under the umbrella of the word conditional but the general premise is, they are orders that will only be actioned or executed if certain conditions are met. Unlike a typical market order where it is placed into the market and the price is not guaranteed, conditional orders set out the parameters on how they should be filled from the get-go. This sometimes means they never get executed as the conditions are not met. They are particularly popular with the buy-side as they allow firms to access liquidity without committing to a trade. Traders can represent orders on multiple venues without running the risk of being executed in multiple different places.

Some of the most common include the ‘limit’ order which will only be filled at a specified price or better, a ‘contingent’ order which simultaneously executes two or more transactions on the back of each other, or a ‘stop’ order which orders the buying or selling of a stock one it reaches a certain price.

19. Actionable indication of interests (IOI)

An indication of interest (IOI) is a conditional and non-binding indication of a buyer’s interest in a security that is still in the underwriting stage. It’s a way of participants gauging available liquidity in the market without committing to placing an order. Sell-side firms will often pitch IOI liquidity to clients as a way of offering a natural other side. An actionable IOI takes this one step further, firming up an indication and offering the liquidity up in a click to trade format.

IOIs can be executed via a variety of workflows. Firms can submit an IOI to a venue seeking liquidity as a non-actionable IOI. When a match is found they can then firm up said IOI to make it actionable. Some EMS providers have integrated this workflow into their technology to streamline it further. Participants can access actionable IOI liquidity straight from their trading blotter within their EMS.  

20. Request for quote (RFQ) and request for market (RFM)

Our final innovation on the list is request for quote (RFQ) and the request for market (RFM) protocols. Both have revolutionised the way fixed income, currencies and commodities (FICC) traders operate in recent years. Both sit under a similar umbrella but other slightly different iterations of each other’s offerings. At the core of both is the idea of allowing fixed income traders to access multiple liquidity providers at once.

Given how bilateral fixed income trading has historically been and how sparse liquidity can be in different markets, the protocols allow participants to maximise their chances of finding the other side by sending out requests to trade to multiple people.

RFQ allows buy-side firms to send out a request for a price to multiple firms at once for the purchase or sale of a security. RFM is a slightly different concept and offers firms the chance to request a price for both the buy and sell so as not to give away the direction they intend to trade in. The idea being that firms can protect themselves from market impact by concealing this information from the rest of the market.

These are the 20 innovations we at The TRADE believe have shaped our community’s landscape most heavily in the last few decades.

Our industry is continuously shifting and innovating. Every year new trends and phenomena come to market intended to disrupt and improve the way that traders go about executing in the market. With continuously growing data sets and the prospect of artificial intelligence and greater automation being used on the trading desk in the near future, it’s likely this list could look very different in a few years’ time.

For more TRADE 20 lists visit thetradenews.com

The post The 20 greatest trading innovations appeared first on The TRADE.

Robert Allen, president of FMX Futures Exchange

Having opened on 23 September, the FMX Futures Exchange is the first US interest rate futures exchange to launch with a fully operational, globally connected trading system, allowing for potential capital savings driven by clearing partner LCH’s cross-margin capabilities.

BGC Group and ten global investment banks and market-making firms announced a partnership in April 2024 to create FMX Holdings which includes the exchange, as well as a spot foreign exchange platform, and a US cash treasuries platform.

“We are pleased ION connected to the FMX Futures Exchange. The combination of the FMX Futures Exchange with LCH will provide clients with choice, innovative execution technology, and potentially significant cross-margin capabilities,” said Robert Allen, president of FMX Futures Exchange.

ION supports FMX across its cleared derivatives front-, middle-, and back-office platforms, allowing banks and brokers using ION’s technology stack to offer clients advanced execution capabilities and clearing services on the new exchange from day one.

Read more: Fireside Friday with… ION’s Edoardo Pacenti

“The joint effort with FMX Futures Exchange demonstrates once again the effectiveness of ION’s front-to-back product strategy: the powerful combination of modern, integrated solutions across execution and clearing removes the technical barriers often hindering market readiness and participation,” said Francesco Margini, chief product officer for cleared derivatives at ION Markets.

The post ION connects to FMX Futures Exchange to bolster execution and post-trade clearing appeared first on The TRADE.

He most recently worked as a trader and portfolio manager at Unigestion for one and a half years and before that worked in equity trading related roles at Citi. 

“We are pleased to announce a new appointment in our KCx team, Faruk Akar […] to help develop the Kepler Cheuvreux strategy of growing its execution footprint and expertise,” said Kepler in an announcement on social media. 

The firm also confirmed that PT is one of the 5 key strategic ambitions at KCx going forward.

Read more: Kepler Cheuvreux head of equity sales trading departs

Akar has also previously served as an associate, equities strategy, at quantitative investment management firm Winton.

The post Unigestion trader joins Kepler Cheuvreux appeared first on The TRADE.

This year, The TRADE is proud to be celebrating its twentieth anniversary and to mark the momentous occasion we are excited to be launching the first North American iteration of our famous Leaders in Trading awards. 

The shortlists for the Leaders in Trading New York Buy-Side Awards have been produced following a slew of nominations from key industry players across North America, recognising whom amongst their peers stand out as the most deserving of these recognitions. 

Congratulations to all those nominated across the five categories! The winners will be announced at the Leaders in Trading New York glittering awards night to be held at Chelsea Piers in New York City on 19 November.

“The Buy-Side Awards are the highlight of Leaders in Trading,” said The TRADE’s editor Annabel Smith. “We couldn’t be more excited to be bringing the magic of Leaders in Trading over to the US for the first time in The TRADE’s 20-year history.” 

The categories for the Buy-Side Awards include the coveted Trader of the Year – Long Only, Trader of the Year – Hedge Fund,  the Trading Desk of the Year Awards, and Buy-Side Market Structure Expert of the Year. 

Also set to be recognised on the night are this year’s Rising Stars of Trading and Execution, North America – to be announced in due course. 

Many congratulations to all the shortlisted individuals and teams, it will be a night to remember! 

Trader of the Year – Long Only 

Megan Davidson, BlackRock

Chris Fiorito, River Road Asset Management

Stephanie Fraser, Baillie Gifford 

Jay Peters, Artisan Partners 

Jason Siegendorf, Harris Associates

Trader of the Year – Hedge Fund

David Alfred, Conversant Capital

Adam Nemser, Southpoint Capital

Keith Roscoe, Jericho Capital Asset Management

Craig Tscherne, Verition Fund Management

Renato Zimberknopf, Fourth Sail Capital

Trading Desk of the Year

Balyasny Asset Management 

BlackRock 

Millennium

Thompson, Siegel & Walmsley LLC

Wellington Management  

Fixed Income Trading Desk of the Year 

Invesco

Janus Henderson

Legal & General Investment Management (LGIM)

PIMCO 

T. Rowe Price

Buy-Side Market Structure Expert of the Year

Simon Cohen, Morgan Stanley Investment Management

Dan Eisemann, MFS Investment Management

Melissa Hinmon, Glenmede Investment Management

Mett Kinack, T. Rowe Price

Ed McBride, Centiva Management

Key contacts at The TRADE 

Please contact Patrick Wright at patrick.wright@thetradenews.com for sponsorship opportunities or to book a table for Leaders in Trading New York.

If you are a member of the buy-side community and would like information on attending please contact Karen Delahoy at karen.delahoy@thetradenews.com or Annabel Smith at annabel.smith@thetradenews.com.

The post Leaders in Trading New York 2024: Buy-side shortlists revealed appeared first on The TRADE.

Algorithms, especially when developed and managed internally, can significantly enhance the front-office tech stack. They reduce costs, lower market impact, and increase execution transparency. While the primary perception is that algorithms help investors execute orders efficiently, there’s much more to it.

For instance, the additional data collected by algorithms offers endless possibilities. Storing order book updates received at millisecond intervals in a well-designed database enables high-level back testing. Additional data also provides accurate transaction cost analysis (TCA) and supports various data science and possible AI-driven applications to improve strategies and execution. 

Moreover, algorithms help better understand the market, providing investment managers with valuable information to make more informed decisions. Placing quants directly at the desk creates a high-performance, hybrid workspace that significantly speeds up implementation and optimisation. This setup ensures that both quants and investment managers learn from each other, potentially creating a new and more capable type of quantitative investment manager. 

Finally, using algorithms makes your organisation more attractive to top quants in the labour market. Talented young professionals are eager to work on challenging data and tech projects where they can develop their own innovative ideas.

Are in-house algorithmic execution platforms the way forward?

When I look at the current state of the market and see all the developments taking place, I believe this will be the way forward. In recent years, the possibilities for developing your own applications have increased enormously. Combined with the rise in tech-savvy talent, this creates the perfect environment for companies in the sector to develop their own in-house execution platforms.

Having the ability to manage, optimise, and implement your own algorithms allows organisations to retain all associated knowledge internally. This not only provides a significant advantage over peers but also prepares your organisation for the rapidly evolving digital future. An execution platform also grants direct market access to several liquidity providers. With the newly unlocked data from the execution platform, it becomes easy to determine where and with whom to execute transactions. Adding new trading venues or banks is quicker and more efficient compared to traditional methods.

Additionally, your organisation can respond swiftly to new market developments to stay ahead. Creating an in-house execution platform also enables you to establish a high-standard risk management and governance framework tailored to your organisation’s needs.

All in all, there are ample reasons and movements within the market to encourage this trend.

How can technology be leveraged in a way that allows traders to execute the same procedures for all FX instruments?

There are numerous ways and opportunities to leverage the vast pool of available technological applications to achieve this. Therefore, there isn’t a single, clear-cut answer to this question. Previously, there was a trend where many technological solutions were purchased by organisations due to a lack of skills and manpower to build them internally. Nowadays, more organisations employ talented and well-qualified individuals who can develop these solutions in-house.

This doesn’t mean that everyone in the sector is building their own applications and tools for all FX instruments. However, there is a noticeable trend of organisations starting to create their own direct market access and/or TCA tools, which shows promise for potentially serving all FX instruments and also the non-FX instruments.

The market still needs to take some steps to make this possible. For example, in the FX Swap market, we are seeing initial moves where parties are providing streaming prices, which could enable the buy-side to develop in-house algorithms for FX Swaps.

For now, technology can be leveraged mainly in the pre- and post-trade procedures to execute the same processes for all FX instruments. Post-trade data for all FX instruments is already widely available, if not already stored by your organisation. This data can be used to create in-house TCA tools or back testing engines for all FX instruments, helping to improve execution.

In short, the possibilities are endless, and it is up to your organisation to determine how to best utilise them.

What are the main barriers when it comes to reaching this goal?

First of all, the technology must be made available to your employees and easily accessible for them to work with. This involves addressing several risk management, security and architectural challenges. Therefore, having a reliable IT partner with a high service level is crucial. Once your IT landscape is in good order and set up according to the highest market standards, you need talented and well-equipped personnel. Fortunately, there has been an increase in tech talent interested in the financial sector, so this should not be too big of an issue.

A bigger challenge might be obtaining internal approvals and managing your in-house developed procedures, applications, and tools for all FX instruments. While creating and testing these technological improvements can be done quickly and easily, getting the business to actually start using them can be more difficult. This means you need to establish a robust and widely supported risk management and governance framework in collaboration with your internal risk management department.

The post In-house algorithmic execution platforms are the way forward appeared first on The TRADE.

Before moving to BCS Global Markets, Cleary was managing director, head of sales trading at BCS Financial Group. 

London-based Cleary has extensive experience working in trading positions. He previously served as head international sales trader at Otkritie Securities, and before that held sales trading roles at VTB Capital and Renaissance Capital.

Cleary has also worked as a hedge fund trader at Walter Capital Management and head of operational risk and control at Bear Stearns International.

The post BCS Global Markets head of equities departs appeared first on The TRADE.

Described as “the average positioning of IA member firms’ views”, the timeline put forward is one of the more aggressive, with most task forces and associations more on board with 2027.   

The IA did add however, that should one or more jurisdictions only be able to transition at a later date before the end of 2027, and can commit to this before the end of 2025, the others should move their transition date back to align.   

The trade body added In the event the UK opts to move to a T+1 security settlement cycle ahead of Europe, there should be a “safe-harbour” exemption on UK traded and settled exchange traded products – including ETFs, ETNs and ETCs – which should remain on a T+2 secondary market settlement cycle until the EU transitions, at which point the exemption should expire.   

Should the EU transition first, a similar “safe harbour” should apply. This should also apply to Eurobonds. 

“In the US, the 15 months set out in February 2023 for a May 2024 go-live was sufficient, with settlement rates achieved by the broader market being higher than prior to the transition,” the IA said in its paper.  

“Whilst the UK, EU and Swiss market infrastructure may be more complicated, it is our view that many of the lessons learnt, system upgrades and process changes that firms undertook for the US transition can be applied in a UK, EU and Swiss context, making T+1 transition achievable by Autumn 2026, 24 months from now.” 

The UK has all-but committed to 2027 now, with Europe’s top markets watchdog subsequently signalling its intentions for moving EU markets to a T+1 settlement cycle through a statement outlining both the urgency of acting and the preference for aligning with the UK and Switzerland. 

“In a period when jurisdictions are aiming to demonstrate and boost the competitiveness of their capital markets, the ecosystem’s ability to enact a fast but orderly transition to T+1 settlement is crucial,” the IA concluded. 

The paper outlines a range of considerations across the UK, EU and Switzerland. One other point was that there should be a recommendation, but not a regulatory requirement, to transition the mutual fund subscription and redemption settlement cycle to T+2 from the common T+3/4 in the UK and other popular EEA fund jurisdictions to coincide with the UK, EU and Swiss transition to T+1 in capital markets.

The post Asset management association pushes for Europe to switch to T+1 in 2026 appeared first on The TRADE.